Real lightsaber hits UK stores

Recommended Videos

Dexiro

New member
Dec 23, 2009
2,977
0
0
It scares me that the first people to get their hands on one of those will be utter dicks that want to take their dickishness to the next level by laughing as they burn through peoples faces. As if it wasn't funny enough when they punch you on the shoulder and pass it off as socializing.

On the other hand though that thing sounds awesome and i want one!!
 

EMFCRACKSHOT

Not quite Cthulhu
May 25, 2009
2,973
0
0
Xanadu84 said:
EMFCRACKSHOT said:
No, bad idea, someones gonna get dead, i know it. Also, why have we not weopnised this yet and made use of it in the warzone.
It's a funny idea, but honestly, it wouldn't work. It would be the least lethal weapon in an army's arsenal, a Flashbang would be infinitely more effective and not cause permanent damage, it would give away the persons position, not to mention the laser wouldn't actually neutralize anyone: Just piss them off, or decrease there effectiveness assuming you hit both eyes. There's no reason not to use a beanbag round, tazer, pepper-ball, etc etc etc instead.

I think its funny that they don't ship to America, the place which has actual guns.
I don't know, i can see some potential. It seems like the thing you could quite easily tape the barrel of a gun as an extra secondary, non lethal weapon. And apparently its powerful enough to set things on fire if held on for long enough. Bunch of insurgents in a house? Just point your laser at it and poof, problem gone.
 

Double A

New member
Jul 29, 2009
2,270
0
0
Demented Teddy said:
Double A said:
Demented Teddy said:
The_Graff said:
The_Graff said:
Demented Teddy said:
That needs to be made illegal.
No civilian should have access to weapons!
pansy
just to clarify, why do you trust the government to the extent that you would gladly allow them monopoly on weapons? an armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man is a subject.
Just so you know you need to quote my post, not yours.

The state is far more trust-worthy then a random person I feel.
I am loyal to and trust the state, the state works for the benefit of the country.
The individual nearly all the time works for their own benefit.

Trust me, if the state collapsed and your country turned into an anarchist country I can gaurantee you that all the people with guns wont be as friendly as they are now.
Sorry bud, but I gotta side with Locke here. What if the government is extremely corrupt?

No wait, let me start again.

What if the corrupt government bans guns, and later, or if they already have, make the system one-party and enforce their rule with the military by giving all of the soldiers benefits such as increased pay and not having to work in the slave factories? Unlikely, I'll admit, but better safe than sorry.
Wanting to be authoritarian is not corruption.
The slave factory thing though....it depends how and why it's done and how the slaves are picked.
Communists were corrupt, and they were authoritarian. And still are.
And the slave factories are just an example.

Wait, do you actually want an authoritarian government?
 

Nmil-ek

New member
Dec 16, 2008
2,597
0
0
Angryman101 said:
Demented Teddy said:
Angryman101 said:
Demented Teddy said:
That needs to be made illegal.
Civilians should not have access to weapons!
You can take away my right to protect my property, family, and free speech out of my cold, dead hands.
Oh I would gladly do that, don't you worry.
Then you take pleasure in the act of ending someone's life? I have seeing trouble how this makes you much better than people who want guns in order to protect themselves and their ways of life.

Nmil-ek said:
Angryman101 said:
Demented Teddy said:
That needs to be made illegal.
All civilians should have access to weapons!
Changed that for you. Much better.
You can take away my right to protect my property, family, and free speech out of my cold, dead hands.
Really think if the government wanted you dead a shotgun would make any difference? And why do people always use that additive last time I checked a gun is not speech, if they start banning or editing your litterature or tapping your phonecalls sure *cough texas schoolboard republicans cough*
A shotgun would certainly make a difference once the rest of the citizenship starts to rise up and every possible gun would be needed. Demented Teddy is talking about an Authoritarian system of government, essentially a dictatorship. The populace will not permit such a government to be formed willingly, which means that secret police and censorship will be instated in order to control them. My free speech will be infringed upon in that context, and I'll be damned if I give it up without a fight. And who the fuck are you to tell me I can't defend my home from looters or robbers or murderers? Please, inform me, god-being; for you must be so important that you can tell me what I can and cannot do with my hard-earned money.
The first sign of a piss poor argument is retaliation on a personal level, we could have had a discussion hell I was typing a retord as soon as I saw you reply. Now no, I'll report you and next time dont act like a fricking dick.
 

wax88

New member
Sep 10, 2009
226
0
0
Omega V said:
steeple said:
just a question:

what if a group of people, lets call them "terrorists", will each buy this device, go into a place filled with people, and just go nuts?
shit hits the fan, i presume?
How about a more pertinent question: what happens when a group of people, lets call them "Army" straps a 100 of these to a gunship and just goes nuts?

....
too late, the airforce beat you to it, they (USAF) have prototypes of an AC130 with laser weaponry as well as a 747 fitted with one huge laser for shooting down ballistic missiles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Tactical_Laser
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1
 

Mr. Gency

New member
Jan 26, 2010
1,702
0
0
EMFCRACKSHOT said:
No, bad idea, someones gonna get dead, i know it. Also, why have we not weopnised this yet and made use of it in the warzone.
Because no one can handle such a large amount of bad-assness.
 

Addendum_Forthcoming

Queen of the Edit
Feb 4, 2009
3,647
0
0
Why? WHY!!!!?????

"Because I can" is not a good enough excuse for making what is essential a weapon for public consumption. No matter how cool a weapon it may be ... it's still a weapon.

A recoil-less laser that looks like a lightsabre ... I foresee no children killing themselves and friends with it at all.
 

Angryman101

New member
Aug 7, 2009
519
0
0
Nmil-ek said:
Angryman101 said:
Demented Teddy said:
Angryman101 said:
Demented Teddy said:
That needs to be made illegal.
Civilians should not have access to weapons!
You can take away my right to protect my property, family, and free speech out of my cold, dead hands.
Oh I would gladly do that, don't you worry.
Then you take pleasure in the act of ending someone's life? I have seeing trouble how this makes you much better than people who want guns in order to protect themselves and their ways of life.

Nmil-ek said:
Angryman101 said:
Demented Teddy said:
That needs to be made illegal.
All civilians should have access to weapons!
Changed that for you. Much better.
You can take away my right to protect my property, family, and free speech out of my cold, dead hands.
Really think if the government wanted you dead a shotgun would make any difference? And why do people always use that additive last time I checked a gun is not speech, if they start banning or editing your litterature or tapping your phonecalls sure *cough texas schoolboard republicans cough*
A shotgun would certainly make a difference once the rest of the citizenship starts to rise up and every possible gun would be needed. Demented Teddy is talking about an Authoritarian system of government, essentially a dictatorship. The populace will not permit such a government to be formed willingly, which means that secret police and censorship will be instated in order to control them. My free speech will be infringed upon in that context, and I'll be damned if I give it up without a fight. And who the fuck are you to tell me I can't defend my home from looters or robbers or murderers? Please, inform me, god-being; for you must be so important that you can tell me what I can and cannot do with my hard-earned money.
The first sign of a piss poor argument is retaliation on a personal level, we could have had a discussion hell I was typing a retord as soon as I saw you reply. Now no, I'll report you and next time dont act like a fricking dick.
Your response had a mocking tone to it. Perhaps I acted a smidge too quickly.
 

fanklok

Legendary Table User
Jul 17, 2009
2,355
0
0
Altio said:
NOTE:Feel free to point out any flaws in my thinking or grammar so I can rewrite this and phrase it better, I am not good at portraying my feelings completely through words.
Me either, I prefer to use fists or deadly lasers. Now if only I could find a proper deadly laser to do so with.
 

Xero Scythe

New member
Aug 7, 2009
3,463
0
0
ad5x5 said:
just wait til a f*cktard points one at a plane and blinds a pilot, bringing down a jet airliner.
Yeah. And if I'm the pilot, I'm gonna do my damnnest to bring that airliner down on that f*cktard's head.
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
EMFCRACKSHOT said:
I don't know, i can see some potential. It seems like the thing you could quite easily tape the barrel of a gun as an extra secondary, non lethal weapon. And apparently its powerful enough to set things on fire if held on for long enough. Bunch of insurgents in a house? Just point your laser at it and poof, problem gone.
The problem here is that your thinking about cool, not practicality.

First off, if you think about it, you will likely see the problem of attaching a non-lethal weapon to a giant gun. It takes up space, weight, and power in order to blind the enemy milliseconds before it rips them apart.

Second, you're greatly overestimating the capacity of this lazer. We have a vast arsenal of ways to make a structure disappear already. Ones which arn't defeated by reflective surfaces, and likely violates some Geneva conventions regarding unnecessary pain and suffering. But more importantly, this lazer won't burn a hole through thin plywood, much less a location containing military threats. Assuming you could, on a helicopter or similar bouncy, moving vehicle, keep the lazer at pinpoint accuracy for long enough to ignite the surface, and assuming the fire spreads, and assuming it's not dealt with...well then you have to wonder why you didn't just use an incendiary round. Hell at that point, a flaming arrow would be more practical.

I Agree it would be awesome. But sadly, I'm quite confident that it is vastly outclassed in every way, shape, and form by technology that is decades, of not centuries, old.
 

Addendum_Forthcoming

Queen of the Edit
Feb 4, 2009
3,647
0
0
The one thing I want to know is how the hell did they manage to make a battery to accomodate such a high light output, yet still make it portable? o_O

I mean .. you'd reckon that you'd have to carry the equivalent of a battery the size of a backpack to use it ... like in Akira.
 

CloggedDonkey

New member
Nov 4, 2009
4,055
0
0
This totally won't go wrong, nope, not at all.

OT: Wow, that really needs to be band, and the businesses shut down. I know the government going around shutting things down is very bad for PR, but you have a company selling a weapon touting as being the most deadly of it's kind ever, without any restrictions, to anyone, anywhere (in the U.K.), for a rather small price. I'm pretty sure you can't even buy a gun for two hundred seventy dollars (rough estimate), which at least then it's registered and each gun can be traced, at least in one way or another.
 

Angryman101

New member
Aug 7, 2009
519
0
0
Demented Teddy said:
We're nothing alike, though. I fight for me and mine, I could care less about society and government, except when it starts infringing upon my personal freedoms. Then it's time to revolt.
I'm unsure if you're mocking me when you say that I understand where you're coming from. Untrained populaces have a tendency to be an incredibly destructive force, especially in modern times when governments can be demonized world-wide for the deaths of civilians. Once an organized revolt is formed, enemies of the country can openly aggrieve the state in the name of the revolutionaries due to the unfavorable policies of the demonized government. People the world over will support the destruction of this government, and more and more power and funding will pour into the revolution. It would have a fair chance of working with the proper support of both the foreign state's/states' coffers and military training and the inevitable defectors coming from the authoritarian government's army.
 

ninjajoeman

New member
Mar 13, 2009
934
0
0
Isn't this more like a blaster?

but in all seriousness... I'm trying to think of a use for this I mean welding sounds plausible maybe a camp fire lighter... or an emergency flare throw up a chunk of wood shoot it with the lazer and its on fire. I seriously want this but I really don't know if man should have this much laser without some sort of intervention.

I just read into this and its ONLY 135 euros! sure that's alot but I was expecting the 1000 area!
my god do you need a license or something please tell me that?