ChromeAlchemist said:
Arcticflame said:
While I don't disagree with your general message.. music isn't entirely as subjective as people make it out to be.
If someone cries subjective after I tell them britney spears is bad music, they are still wrong. A person can like any crap at all, I won't mind. But if they tell me their crap is better than some of the bands I highly respect, I am rather troubled.
I can see what you are saying, but what is good music and what is bad music though? Whatever you tell me will be your own subjective opinion. In a sense if you are calling their music crap, what stops yours from being crap?
Depends what they are talking about, When I say a song is good, I can mean either I like the song, or I think the song is good.
To explain further, If I happen to like a cat yowling as music, that's fine, but I must admit it didn't take much effort or musical ability to create.
Therefore Cat yowling, I like it, but it isn't a good song.
By the same token, if I dislike mozart entirely, can't stand it. I can say I don't like it, but I can respect it for it's musical quality. Good song, but I don't like it.
I usually base what I like on purely my subjective taste, but my favourite bands tend to be bands that sound good and mix in innovation and complexity (not necessarily complexity of playing, but complexity of differen't techniques or cross-genre, or dabbling in experimentation, etc. I mean a lot of things when I say complexity.
There are bands that also focus on creating minimalistic sounds as well, which can be brilliant in their own right, but that'll lead me a bit off what I am talking about so I'll leave it at that.