?Varchld said:I heard it was pretty sexy ^^Lukeje said:And you haven't heard my authoritative tone of voice.
?Varchld said:I heard it was pretty sexy ^^Lukeje said:And you haven't heard my authoritative tone of voice.
Wait, did you not read that last part? Sometimes nonviolence doesn't work. There have been many kids that despite us punishing them over and over again by forcing themm to stay in the cabin except during meal time and taking away their canteen, they still start fights with other kids, don't listen to us, and just generally behave badly. These kids need some stronger incentive to not act this way, and since we can't hit them, we're stuck having to endure these little terrors.Lukeje said:Huh, sounds like they're doing a pretty good job of punishing you without resorting to physical violence...Evilbunny said:I've worked at a summer sleep away camp for the past four years as a counselor and I would say the majority of kids there don't stop doing shit if I just tell them not to. I have to punish them in some way (obviously I can't hit them, I punish them by taking away their canteen or something)and sometimes even that doesn't work. I am convinced the majority of these kids could benefit from a good spanking.
So he burns himself, and he learns that way. He'd then take you more seriously in the future (NOTE I am not condoning letting children burn themselves, just pointing out that it seems to be an inevitable consequence of this scenario, as there's no guarantee that even after you hit him, he won't try to do it again).Morderkaine said:And then when timmy walks towards the fire a second time, and you explain to him again. And then another day tries it again a third time, then you spank. Cause what you did before wasnt working. Of course it will probably work most times, when it doesnt then you need something else.
Just jokingLukeje said:?Varchld said:I heard it was pretty sexy ^^
You're not taking into account all of the effects of discipline, or stating whether you're refering to spanking or other types of discipline.Morderkaine said:Common sense. Which has a higher chance of growing up committing crimes - a child with proper discipline at home (of whatever form you deem the most effective) or one who receives no dicipline at home at all with parents who dont care what he or she does.
Of course the kid with no discipline is more likely to grow up wrong. So it stands to reason that if all kids received proper discipline the percentage of kids growing up wrong and committing crimes would decrease, ergo there are cases where better dicipline at home would have prevented what happened.
Difficult one I know, I'm only able to find stats from 2003 as well for some reason; but remember Cheeze; you're talking about gun-crime in there as well. Texas also has capital punishment and one of the higher cases of gun-crime/murder.Cheeze_Pavilion said:I realize that's not exactly on point, but, best relevant statistics I could find.
That might be true of some of them, but I've seen quite a few of them interact with their parents, and the lack of respect they show in front of them surely wouldn't exist if their parents hit them at home. Here is one example that sticks out in my mind. A mother and her son are unpacking the car on the first day, and this is what happened.Cheeze_Pavilion said:That's different than parenting. They probably won't listen because they have bad parents. Maybe...because their parents *do* hit them, and figure 'if you can't hit me, why should I fear you?'Evilbunny said:I've worked at a summer sleep away camp for the past four years as a counselor and I would say the majority of kids there don't stop doing shit if I just tell them not to.
Yeah...hope in one hand...Cheeze_Pavilion said:I hope he forgets me entirely.The_root_of_all_evil said:So he now knows he can walk all over you now?
That explains a lot about you, Root...[/quote]That's bad? Grief...did you go private?I think that's a problem for the therapist...I mean, I'm all for boys being boys and roughhousing, but...
That was run of the mill for us.
And the data from when corporal punishment was allowed is... where?The_root_of_all_evil said:Difficult one I know, I'm only able to find stats from 2003 as well for some reason; but remember Cheeze; you're talking about gun-crime in there as well. Texas also has capital punishment and one of the higher cases of gun-crime/murder.Cheeze_Pavilion said:I realize that's not exactly on point, but, best relevant statistics I could find.
However, as England has banned it.
Truancy reaches record high [http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2006/sep/21/schools.uk1]
92% of teachers have been verbally abused [http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2007/feb/23/schools.uk2]
Nearly 10,000 children were expelled from school this year [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4022123.stm]
Hell's teeth, please NEVER have children. I'd rather have a smacked backside than a smoking stump.Lukeje said:So he burns himself, and he learns that way. He'd then take you more seriously in the future (NOTE I am not condoning letting children burn themselves, just pointing out that it seems to be an inevitable consequence of this scenario, as there's no guarantee that even after you hit him, he won't try to do it again).
Were you not listening before? We tried punishing this kid all summer to make him behave, but since his mother was so lenient at home he was a disrespectful little **** and nothing got through to him. If your kid listens to you when you tell him to not do something then yay good for you, but sometimes that's not enough. Sometimes physical pain is the only thing he responds to.Cheeze_Pavilion said:Exactly--you go right from 'do nothing and let him get away with it' to 'kick his ass'.Evilbunny said:Here is one example that sticks out in my mind. A mother and her son are unpacking the car on the first day, and this is what happened.
Mother: charles, will you help me carry your clothes inside?
Kid: Shut up mom, you do it yourself.
Mother: (looks at me) What am I going to do with him?
I'll tell you what to do with him, kick his ass!!
There's no DEFCON 2 and 3 and 4 in between?