Well, that's why it has to be mutual. If you went in hoping to become the person's girlfriend, then that's isn't an honest way to enter a Friends with Benefits arrangement.Moonlight Butterfly said:Also make me think I wasn't good enough to be someone's actual girlfriend but good enough to shag...seems super depressing to me :S
Ugh. Yeah, that's not Friends with Benefits. That's Ex Sex. Which can be okay, or it can be depressing, or it can be fucked up (as your example seems to be).Brutal Peanut said:A man was 'friends-with-benefits' with his ex. He said that when the ex. started crying , missing their relationship, and started to confide in him, he just left quickly and then laughed about it; saying that when she started doing that annoying stuff it was time to leave. I thought that story was a bit disturbing and it's stuck with me. That doesn't seem like 'friends-with-benefits' at all, doesn't even sound like 'friends' - it just sounds cruel.
Ah! Here's an excellent example of the archetypical Friends with Benefits. Friends first, have sex casually when not attached. The friendship is core, the sex is corollary.hooblabla6262 said:The first person I ever had sex with was one of the first friends I made in highschool.
Eight years later and I have seen many girlfriends come and go, but that friend is still my friend. And we still have sex when we are both single.
Not really, it just keeps it clean. Its a pragmatic thing. Relationships involve feelings and everything. Dating others is not a problem but once sleeping with others it would be complicated. STD/STI issues become a nuisance.Vault101 said:that sounds like a relationship....Broderick said:While it was just friends with benefits, we agreed to only have sex with one another.
Sounds like fun. ^^Ryan Minns said:Personally I'm a relationship guy though. I am incredibly (it dominates my every thought) sexual and I've done the friends with benefits thing, I've done the different girl a night thing and even hooked up with identical twins once but in the end none of it was for me (most likely due to my reasons for doing it) I wanted the closeness, I want the warmth of having a romantic partner I can hold close and now that I have one I wouldn't trade it for anything else in the world.
I could never do that but I'm not pretty so it's hard enough for me to attract one guy.Bara_no_Hime said:Well, that's why it has to be mutual. If you went in hoping to become the person's girlfriend, then that's isn't an honest way to enter a Friends with Benefits arrangement.Moonlight Butterfly said:Also make me think I wasn't good enough to be someone's actual girlfriend but good enough to shag...seems super depressing to me :S
Rather, you'd have to go in not wanting that person to be your romantic partner, but wanting them to be your sexual partner.
Honestly, I've found it easier to have a good Friends with Benefits situation once I was already in a relationship. That way, I was clearly romantically involved with party X, while only sexually involved with parties Y and Z.
Of course, that requires an open relationship of some sort. Well, assuming you don't want to cheat on your partner, anyway.
Awww. **hugs**Moonlight Butterfly said:I could never do that but I'm not pretty so it's hard enough for me to attract one guy.![]()
Yeah, that's an issue. I once (back in under-grad college) had a male friend (and very occasional Friend with Benefits) who started sleeping with another woman. I asked if they were dating, and he was like "nope, just casual sex" so I was like "oh, okay."Moonlight Butterfly said:I certainly don't look down on anyone who has those kinds of relationships as long as it's mutual and they aren't being 'led on' emotionally as it were.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002132/ Sorry, I had to be a smart ass.craftomega said:"opinion are like ass holes, everyone has one."
I don't think I could manage something like that. I can't see anything wrong with the idea at all but I just don't think I could do it these days. Does seem like a very rewarding set up you've got though, I've seen way too many men and women lock themselves into something and being unable to express themselves sexually. it's depressing to watch since sex is a very enjoyable aspect of life.Bara_no_Hime said:Sounds like fun. ^^
Have you considered trying to find the best of both worlds? Getting into a relationship with someone as sexually expressive as you, and then swinging (ie, having sex with other singles or couples casually)?
That was my solution to a similar issue. Now my spouse and I can have all the fun sex we want with whomever, without giving up the closeness, intimacy, and long-term comforts and closeness of a long-term relationship. Been together over 10 years now.
I've kind of accepted I'm just gonna be alone tbh. It's not that bad there is more to life. I was engaged for 7 years but he hit me a lot cos I couldn't get pregnant.Bara_no_Hime said:snip
"your women"?....jesusArtemis923 said:No, you're not.
That doesn't mean I wouldn't, but you are by no means obligated to do anything for them. All my women know this. They know if they call me at 3 am for help it better be some dire fucking circumstances, because I'm not their bf.
I care about my women, of course, but since I'm not in a relationship I don't have to drop whatever I'm doing and go help them. That's the beauty of it; plus, since I don't HAVE to help them, they appreciate it a lot more when I do.