i wouldn't say morally wrong. i don't think there's anything morally wrong with killing an animal for the sake of food to be wrong in any way. now, you may think that killing for the skin is wrong, but what do people do with the skin of the animal? sell it to make money and thus use that money for food if they wish to continue living so i still so need problem. i do see it being an issue to kill an animal only for the skin and then wasting the meat.Calgetorix said:Well, he does have a point when he says (and I'll try not to put words in his mouth, but) eating meat worse morally than a vegetarian diet. We can get the needed nutrients from a diet which is way less damaging than our current one but still choose the current one because we like it more. From a rational standpoint, we are actually doing something irrational.KnightRider0717 said:does anyone else read this as though he said eating is morally questionable?
yes, pollutants are more important to deal with than seals being killed
i also don't believe it's irrational as i've explained already about the digestive system. why would we decide to consume more food which other people may need to survive so that we get what our body requires to function. if we were evolved for favorably for digestion of plant materials i see how it's irrational, but choosing to consume more food when you could have a bit of meat is irrational